US Helicopters Raid in Abbottabad

Discuss issues and news related to PIA, Pakistani airlines and Pakistan's civil & military aviation.
User avatar
Abbas Ali
Site Admin
Posts: 56806
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 6:52 pm
Location: Pakistan

Re: Where is Ghazi Airbase?

Post by Abbas Ali »

nopy99 wrote:'Stealth helicopters' used in Bin Laden raid

Also this report by BBC suggest the raid team was based on Blackhawks and and also supported by 2 chinooks. I wonder if they would have landed in a remote staging area in Pakistan somewhere.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-13297846
Did those Chinook helicopters also manage to evade detection by Pakistan's air defence system ?

Abbas
Dil Dil Pakistan... Jaan Jaan Pakistan

See you at:
Image
offspring
Registered Member
Posts: 142
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2008 5:33 am

Re: Where is Ghazi Airbase?

Post by offspring »

Excellent observation Abbas. The chinooks were on standby if something went wrong with the primary choppers. On standby means they were close by in Pakistani airspace or in Ghazi airbase.
User avatar
Adnan Anwar
Registered Member
Posts: 967
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 8:52 pm
Location: Toronto, ON

Re: Where is Ghazi Airbase?

Post by Adnan Anwar »

Abbas Ali wrote:
nopy99 wrote:'Stealth helicopters' used in Bin Laden raid

Also this report by BBC suggest the raid team was based on Blackhawks and and also supported by 2 chinooks. I wonder if they would have landed in a remote staging area in Pakistan somewhere.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-13297846
Did those Chinook helicopters also manage to evade detection by Pakistan's air defence system ?

Abbas
In my opinion, this whole operation was done by US but with some behind the scene support from Pakistan. They could not have pulled this whole operation without the knowledge of Pakistan armed forces. Pakistan told them to do the operation because it did not want Osama's blood on its own hands. There is no way a Chinook helicopter can go undetected.
Adnan Anwar
TAILWIND
Registered Member
Posts: 2097
Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2006 4:52 am

Re: Where is Ghazi Airbase?

Post by TAILWIND »

An artist's impression of Blackhawk stealth derivative used in OBL riad.
Image
Another one, this one shows fixed non retractable landing gear which are a big give away for a stealth design.
Image

Uploaded with ImageShack.us
User avatar
Adnan Anwar
Registered Member
Posts: 967
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 8:52 pm
Location: Toronto, ON

Re: Where is Ghazi Airbase?

Post by Adnan Anwar »

Nice find Tailwind.
Adnan Anwar
meekal ahmed
Registered Member
Posts: 417
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 7:35 pm

Re: Where is Ghazi Airbase?

Post by meekal ahmed »

Excellent.
User avatar
Nadir Ali
Registered Member
Posts: 870
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:49 am
Location: Toronto

Re: Where is Ghazi Airbase?

Post by Nadir Ali »

Bin Laden raid's lone glitch could be headache for U.S. military

http://edition.cnn.com/2011/US/05/06/bi ... elicopter/
Washington (CNN) -- The one major problem for the Navy SEALs who killed Osama bin Laden was the crash of one of their helicopters.

It was no ordinary military chopper. Numerous aviation experts say they see several telltale signs of stealth technology in photos of what was left after the SEAL team tried to destroy the craft.

Some think it was a secret aircraft.

"Had this particular helicopter not crashed, we still would have no idea of its existence," said Gareth Jennings, the aviation desk editor for Jane's Defence Weekly.

Jennings and other aviation experts say the helicopter may have been a heavily modified version of the UH-60 Black Hawk, a mainstay of the military's helicopter fleet.

But it may include stealth technology developed for the now-canceled RAH-66 Comanche helicopter. That aircraft was designed to be an armed reconnaissance craft capable of carrying only two people.

Two of the aircraft were built for test flights before the Army canceled the program in 2004, not because of performance but because it needed money to upgrade existing helicopters. At the time, Les Brownlee, then acting secretary of the Army, said, "We will retain relevant technologies developed in the Comanche program."

At the same 2004 briefing about the cancellation of the Comanche, then-Army Chief of Staff Gen. Peter Schoomaker said, "much of what we've gained out of Comanche we can push forward into the tech base for future joint rotorcraft kinds of capabilities as we look further out."

The helicopter in question was left on the ground at the al Qaeda leader's compound during the raid early Monday.

The SEALs were able to destroy much of the main body of the helicopter when it became clear it couldn't fly. But the tail rotor assembly came down on the other side of the compound wall and was left largely intact deep inside Pakistan when the SEALs finished their mission.

Pakistani troops were seen hauling the wreckage away on trucks covered with tarps. The Department of Defense, which would not comment about any speculation about a "stealth helicopter," also wouldn't say whether it's asked Pakistan to give the wreckage back to the United States.

"Given the very strong defense ties that Pakistan and China currently have, I wouldn't be surprised at all to see this wreckage end up in Beijing," Jennings said.

"And that has to be of great concern to the U.S. Department of Defense, because with that technology, the Chinese or any third party could either incorporate that technology into their own aircraft or they can figure out ways to defeat that technology, thereby rending stealth technology like this largely useless in future operations," he said.

What makes the experts think the aircraft that crashed in Abbottabad was a secret "stealth helicopter?"

• "The first thing that stood out, and it may seem like a small thing, is the color scheme. Whereas most Black Hawk Army helicopters are painted olive green, this particular one is gray. Not just any gray; it's infrared-suppressant gray, and the purpose of the IR gray, as it's known, is to help reduce the vulnerability of the helicopter to ground-launched heat-seeking missile systems," Jennings told CNN Pentagon Correspondent Chris Lawrence.

• Photos from Abbottabad show that the chopper had a five-bladed tail rotor. "On a conventional Black Hawk, you have four blades. The addition of the extra rotor blades on the tail rotor hub reduces the acoustic signature of the helicopter there by making it hard to hear, giving the SEALs that extra few minutes to get over the compound before anyone on the ground quite knows what's going on," according to Jennings.

• Those five tail rotor blades are partially covered by a disk-like object that Jennings called a "hub-mounted vibration suppression system." He believes it provides more noise suppression and some possible protection for the tail rotor from bullets of shrapnel. And it's not typical on military helicopters. "No, I've never seen that on an operational helicopter before," Jennings said. But he added that a similar system was part of the Comanche helicopter design.

• The blades on that tail rotor also appear to be shorter and thinner than typical Black Hawk helicopter's blades. One former Army Black Hawk pilot, who asked not to be identified, said, "More blades and shorter blades means the helicopter would make less noise in flight."

It's not just the tail rotor blades that are different. "On the main rotor assembly that was actually destroyed by the SEAL team on the ground the blades themselves are threaded, which signify that these are carbon composite rotor blades as opposed to conventional metal rotor blades, which again signifies aspects of stealth technology that have been incorporated into this particular helicopter," Jennings said.

• Some photos show parts of the helicopter appear similar to non-secret stealth aircraft. "What's left of the tail section of that helicopter, the shape of the fuselage, it's canted. It's angled. It's a shape that's synonymous with fixed-wing stealth fighters such as the F-22, the F-35. Essentially, it's designed to defeat radar. If you eliminate right angles in an aircraft design, radar waves can't bounce back," Jennings said.
Image
User avatar
FULLTHRUST
Registered Member
Posts: 777
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 4:57 pm

Re: Where is Ghazi Airbase?

Post by FULLTHRUST »

It's not just the tail rotor blades that are different. "On the main rotor assembly that was actually destroyed by the SEAL team on the ground the blades themselves are threaded, which signify that these are carbon composite rotor blades as opposed to conventional metal rotor blades, which again signifies aspects of stealth technology that have been incorporated into this particular helicopter," Jennings said.
THREADED - threaded where? Could you please identify the difference of being not detected having "Composites" as compared to "Metal" - Please!!
User avatar
Nadir Ali
Registered Member
Posts: 870
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:49 am
Location: Toronto

Re: Where is Ghazi Airbase?

Post by Nadir Ali »

FULLTHRUST wrote: THREADED - threaded where? Could you please identify the difference of being not detected having "Composites" as compared to "Metal" - Please!!
Ask the people who reported. But the fact is the tail section was left behind and is still very much intact. The front side that was destroyed is no different from a regular blackhawk helicopter in design, so it's a good chance that the once unknown section can be examined. The choppers skin and painting also helps evade detection which is why I'm confident there's at least something the downed helicopter has to offer :wink: 8)
Image
TAILWIND
Registered Member
Posts: 2097
Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2006 4:52 am

Re: Where is Ghazi Airbase?

Post by TAILWIND »

• Those five tail rotor blades are partially covered by a disk-like object that Jennings called a "hub-mounted vibration suppression system." He believes it provides more noise suppression and some possible protection for the tail rotor from bullets of shrapnel. And it's not typical on military helicopters. "No, I've never seen that on an operational helicopter before," Jennings said. But he added that a similar system was part of the Comanche helicopter design.
The disk is a hub fairing, to shield the metallic parts of the rotor hub from radar. It is very difficult if not impossible to make the complicated hub radar non reflective, much easier to have a 'hub cap'. One can see a similar disc on the inside as well,
• It's not just the tail rotor blades that are different. "On the main rotor assembly that was actually destroyed by the SEAL team on the ground the blades themselves are threaded, which signify that these are carbon composite rotor blades as opposed to conventional metal rotor blades, which again signifies aspects of stealth technology that have been incorporated into this particular helicopter," Jennings said.
Composite main rotors is nothing new or extra ordinary. They are in use since early eighties.
User avatar
Abbas Ali
Site Admin
Posts: 56806
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 6:52 pm
Location: Pakistan

Re: Where is Ghazi Airbase?

Post by Abbas Ali »

According to a statement attributed to PAF Air Chief, radars deployed on Pakistan's western borders were inactive on May 2.

Earlier Pakistan's Foreign Office in its statement had said the US helicopter managed to avoid detection by Pakistani radars due to hilly terrain.
“US helicopters entered Pakistani airspace making use of blind spots in the radar coverage due to hilly terrain. US helicopters’ undetected flight into Pakistan was also facilitated by the mountainous terrain, efficacious use of latest technology and ‘nap of the earth’ flying techniques.”

Source: APP
Here's English daily 'The News' report with statement of PAF Air Chief.

Radars were inactive, not jammed: air chief

Hamid Mir

Saturday, May 07, 2011

ISLAMABAD:
Pakistan Air Force has assured the government that no foreign helicopters or fighter planes will be allowed to violate the Pakistani air space in future and if ordered, the PAF can shoot down the US drones.

Air Chief Marshal Rao Qamar Suleman has accepted the responsibility of air surveillance failure but informed the government that the entry of American helicopters into the Pakistani air space was not detected because the radars deployed on the western borders were not active on May 2. He dispelled the impression that the Pakistani radars were jammed.

The success of American operation against Osama bin Laden has raised many questions about the capability of Pakistan Army and Air Force. Tension between Pakistan and the US further increased on Friday after another drone attack in the tribal area. The PAF clearly told the government that they never perceived any threat for urban areas of Pakistan from Afghanistan and that was why the radars deployed close to the western borders were “on rest”. It was learnt that radars deployed on the borders with India and the LoC with the Indian occupied Kashmir are active 24 hours and that was why Pakistan came to know about a possible Indian attack in December 2008 immediately after the Mumbai attacks. It was the evening of December 21, 2008 when Pakistan came to know about the unusual movement of Indian Army and Air Force. When the threat was confirmed, then within minutes Pakistan Air Force night fighters were ordered to fly.

Pakistan has two kinds of radars, high-level radars and low-level radars. High-level radars are meant to protect the air space. Low-level radars are used for training flights. The maximum life of high-level radars is 25,000 hours. These radars need overhauling after three years and they cannot work after nine years. Due to the expensive nature of high-level radars, Pakistan Air Force does not use these machines 24 hours on western borders and that was the reason the American helicopters entered Pakistan without challenge.

It was also learnt that Pakistan Air Force informed the government long ago for the need of a modern surveillance system, which could cover all the areas of Pakistan. On the request of the PAF, the former government made a deal with Sweden and China for the purchase of modern aircraft with radar systems.

The PAF has received three Airborne Warning and Control System (AWACS) planes from Sweden and one more will come in June 2011. China has provided one ZDK-03 Airborne Early Warning and Control (AEWC) plane and three more will come at the end of this year. These modern machines will be activated soon and it will cover the whole of Pakistan. In the meanwhile, PAF activated all radars deployed on the western borders after the May 2 incident, which means that foreign forces present in Afghanistan will now be considered as a threat to the security of Pakistan.

Source: The News
Dil Dil Pakistan... Jaan Jaan Pakistan

See you at:
Image
TAILWIND
Registered Member
Posts: 2097
Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2006 4:52 am

Re: Where is Ghazi Airbase?

Post by TAILWIND »

Not being poilitical, but their is logical next step once one accepts responsibility......Being not surprised is one of the most basic strategic lessons.
User avatar
Abbas Ali
Site Admin
Posts: 56806
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 6:52 pm
Location: Pakistan

Re: Where is Ghazi Airbase?

Post by Abbas Ali »

According to local news channels, PAF spokesman Air Commodore Tariq Qamar Yazdani has dismissed 'The News' report claiming that radars on western front were not active on May 2.

All PAF radars were functional on May 2 according to PAF spokesman.

Abbas
Dil Dil Pakistan... Jaan Jaan Pakistan

See you at:
Image
TAILWIND
Registered Member
Posts: 2097
Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2006 4:52 am

Re: Where is Ghazi Airbase?

Post by TAILWIND »

I found this Depiction of the Op Neptube Spear form David Cenciotti's blog page.
http://cencio4.wordpress.com/A good visualisation, intersting to read.

Image
TAILWIND
Registered Member
Posts: 2097
Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2006 4:52 am

Re: Where is Ghazi Airbase?

Post by TAILWIND »

Abbas Ali wrote:.........................
Here's English daily 'The News' report with statement of PAF Air Chief.
Radars were inactive, not jammed: air chief
Hamid Mir
Pakistan has two kinds of radars, high-level radars and low-level radars. High-level radars are meant to protect the air space. Low-level radars are used for training flights.

How absurd.....My dear sir, High Level radars are for high level surviellence and Low Level Radars are for low level detection.
The maximum life of high-level radars is 25,000 hours. These radars need overhauling after three years and they cannot work after nine years. Due to the expensive nature of high-level radars, Pakistan Air Force does not use these machines 24 hours on western borders and that was the reason the American helicopters entered Pakistan without challenge.

So is the case for Gulfstreams, citations, learjets, Phenoms and so on. Do they ever think twice to fly these for personal use forgetting the 'expensive nature'.
n the meanwhile, PAF activated all radars deployed on the western borders after the May 2 incident, which means that foreign forces present in Afghanistan will now be considered as a threat to the security of Pakistan.

Better late then never.
On another note I have come to know that NATO, ISAF and US military aircraft passing through Pakistani Airspace in the south east Balochistan are not under active control of Pakistan air traffic control, rather they have been given a corridor from Jiwani up north to Aghanistan border.
My question; were'nt there any human intelligence assets og our agencies in or around Jalalabad or Bagram to detect such a large movement of aircraft. Moreover had we got some control or monitoring of the above mentioned corridor, the traffic pattern could have been monitored, analysed and some un-usual activity might have been detected.